Re: RAID-6 disk superblock issue
From: Troy Telford <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-14 21:41:52
On 2011-12-14 19:01:01 +0000, Phil Turmel said:
Hi Troy, On 12/13/2011 05:42 PM, Troy Telford wrote: Let me guess: You have version 0.90 superblock, and sdl1 covers the whole device?
sdl1 does cover the entire device, but I'm fairly certain I do not have a 0.90 superblock (Unless 0.90 was the standard version for Linux 2.6 about two years ago.) Unfortunately, I'm not sure how to get my current superblock version: $ sudo mdadm --examine /dev/md2 mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/md2. I find it curious that I can't detect the superblock for the MD device, even though the device is up, active, and working.
Short term, change your mdadm.conf to only accept device names that end with a digit. Like so: DEVICE /dev/sd[a-z][1-9]
OK, I'll give that a whirl. For the record, it was DEVICE partitions previously.
Then rebuild your initramfs to include the new mdadm.conf. Long term, rebuild your array with v1.x metadata.
You know, I was hoping to be able to wait until btrfs handles RAID-6 (or "raid-z") arrays by the time I had to rebuild the array. I guess I'm not that lucky. -- Troy Telford