Thread (116 messages) 116 messages, 18 authors, 2011-03-25

Re: high throughput storage server?

flat view

From: Mattias Wadenstein <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-21 10:04:21

On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Joe Landman wrote:
On 02/18/2011 08:49 AM, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
[...]
quoted
2U machines with 12 3.5" or 16-24 2.5" hdd slots can be gotten pretty
cheaply. Add a quad-gige card if your load can get decent sequential
load, or look at fast/ssd 2.5" drives if you are mostly short random
reads. Then add as many as you need to sustain the analysis speed you
need. The advantage here is that this is really scalable, if you double
the number of servers you get at least twice the IO capacity.

Oh, yet another setup I've seen is adding a some (2-4) fast disks to
each of the analysis machines and then running a distributed replicated
filesystem like hadoop over them.
Ugh ... short-stroking drives or using SSDs?  Quite cost-inefficient for this work.  And given the HPC nature of the problem, its probably a good idea to aim for more cost-efficient.
Or just regular fairly slow sata drives. The advantage being that it is really cheap to get to 100-200 spindles this way, so you might not need very fast disks. It depends on your IO pattern, but for the LHC data analysis this has been showed to be surprisingly fast.

/Mattias Wadenstein
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help