linux-raid archive · February 2011

912 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• STALE5671d high throughput storage server?
  2011-02-28 23:14 · 73 replies this month · Matt Garman <hidden>
• STALE5694d [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly
  2011-02-28 15:07 · 5 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• STALE5696d [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
  2011-02-28 13:35 · 8 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• STALE5682d [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size
  2011-02-28 05:00 · 0 replies this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• STALE5690d stripe cache question
  2011-02-27 11:37 · 4 replies this month · Piergiorgio Sartor <hidden>
• STALE5697d OK, Now this is really weird
  2011-02-27 07:57 · 7 replies this month · Leslie Rhorer <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: Removed drive from mdadm raid 5 array after reboot
  2011-02-27 03:13 · 0 replies this month · Mike Viau <hidden>
• STALE5681d mdadm ddf questions
  2011-02-25 17:53 · 3 replies this month · Albert Pauw <hidden>
• STALE5699d auto-read-only question
  2011-02-25 16:26 · 1 reply this month · Albert Pauw <hidden>
• STALE5699d [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays
  2011-02-25 11:08 · 2 replies this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• STALE5699d Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38
  2011-02-25 08:30 · 3 replies this month · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] Partitions could be meaningful on single-drive RAID0
  2011-02-25 06:30 · 0 replies this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays (V2)
  2011-02-25 01:17 · 0 replies this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• STALE5700d failed drive in raid 1 array
  2011-02-24 22:00 · 14 replies this month · Roberto Nunnari <hidden>
• STALE5700d [BUG 2.6.32] md/raid1: barrier disabling does not work correctly in all cases
  2011-02-24 21:04 · 4 replies this month · Paul Clements <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Please i wait to hear from you urgently, it very important
  2011-02-24 19:14 · 0 replies this month · Ian Davies <hidden>
• STALE5700d Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
  2011-02-24 17:27 · 2 replies this month · Lasse Jensen <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies -Y option patch
  2011-02-24 14:31 · 0 replies this month · Albert Pauw <hidden>
• STALE5701d Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
  2011-02-24 04:06 · 8 replies this month · Claude Nobs <hidden>
• STALE5701d failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing
  2011-02-23 22:33 · 3 replies this month · Iordan Iordanov <hidden>
• STALE5693d Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
  2011-02-23 20:55 · 1 reply this month · Lasse Jensen <hidden>
• STALE5701d removing AHCI SATA devices
  2011-02-23 16:21 · 5 replies this month · Simon Mcnair <hidden>
• STALE5701d [PATCH 0/4] Prepare assembled array for reshape (expansion)
  2011-02-23 13:52 · 4 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• STALE5701d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
  2011-02-23 10:01 · 2 replies this month · Jeff Moyer <hidden>
• STALE5702d md road-map: 2011
  2011-02-23 05:06 · 51 replies this month · NeilBrown <hidden>
• STALE5702d Single-drive RAID0
  2011-02-23 02:20 · 15 replies this month · Wojcik, Krzysztof <hidden>
• STALE5702d Two questions about stripe_cache_size
  2011-02-22 22:35 · 6 replies this month · Patrick J. LoPresti <hidden>
• STALE5702d raid10 - without stripe
  2011-02-22 21:22 · 2 replies this month · Roberto Spadim <hidden>
• STALE5702d Re: Linux software RAID assistance
  2011-02-22 19:06 · 9 replies this month · Phil Turmel <hidden>
• STALE5702d SSD - TRIM command
  2011-02-22 17:15 · 66 replies this month · Roberto Spadim <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Combining RAID6 and mdadm RAID10?
  2011-02-22 15:43 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Garanti Internal Issues
  2011-02-22 15:23 · 0 replies this month · Garanti <hidden>
• STALE5702d Possible availability improvement
  2011-02-22 14:53 · 1 reply this month · Michał Sawicz <hidden>
• STALE5703d [PATCH] set default chunk in validate_geometry
  2011-02-22 00:25 · 1 reply this month · Czarnowska, Anna <hidden>
• STALE5703d New machine, new RAID, wrong device name...
  2011-02-21 22:14 · 2 replies this month · Mark Knecht <hidden>
• STALE5703d Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
  2011-02-21 21:14 · 1 reply this month · Jeff Moyer <hidden>
• STALE5535d [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
  2011-02-21 20:45 · 0 replies this month · Piergiorgio Sartor <hidden>
• STALE5704d [PATCH 1/2] modified message on failure to read metadata in Manage
  2011-02-21 05:46 · 1 reply this month · Czarnowska, Anna <hidden>
• STALE5704d Re: Linux software RAID assistance
  2011-02-20 19:25 · 1 reply this month · Phil Turmel <hidden>
• STALE5704d Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array
  2011-02-20 09:57 · 9 replies this month · Larry Schwerzler <hidden>
• STALE5704d Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
  2011-02-20 09:52 · 12 replies this month · Mathias Burén <hidden>
• STALE5705d Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
  2011-02-19 18:18 · 1 reply this month · Phil Turmel <hidden>
• STALE5705d Linux software RAID assistance
  2011-02-19 17:37 · 51 replies this month · Simon McNair <hidden>
• STALE5705d External bitmap, questions
  2011-02-19 12:32 · 7 replies this month · Mathias Burén <hidden>
• STALE5705d Upgrading from RAID 5 to 6 or build native level 6?
  2011-02-19 12:28 · 2 replies this month · Lasse Jensen <hidden>
• STALE5706d Recovery Optimization?
  2011-02-19 04:54 · 2 replies this month · Jon Forrest <hidden>
• STALE5706d User space RAID-6 access
  2011-02-18 23:02 · 12 replies this month · Piergiorgio Sartor <hidden>
• STALE5706d Removed drive from mdadm raid 5 array after reboot
  2011-02-18 20:49 · 1 reply this month · Mike Viau <hidden>
• STALE5706d mdadm / force parity checking of blocks on all reads?
  2011-02-18 12:07 · 4 replies this month · Steve Costaras <hidden>
• STALE5706d raid5/raid6 write performance question
  2011-02-18 09:56 · 2 replies this month · Patrick J. LoPresti <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies hdparm standby timeout stopped working
  2011-02-18 09:47 · 0 replies this month · Marc Rechté <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems
  2011-02-18 03:50 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• STALE5707d Re: physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems
  2011-02-18 01:51 · 1 reply this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/2] fix: memory leak in Create
  2011-02-17 22:46 · 0 replies this month · Czarnowska, Anna <hidden>
• STALE5624d reshape failure
  2011-02-17 21:39 · 4 replies this month · Tobias McNulty <hidden>
• STALE5707d Mixing mdadm versions
  2011-02-17 14:16 · 2 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5707d [PATCH] FIX: sysfs_disk_to_scsi_id() adapted to current sysfs format
  2011-02-17 12:35 · 2 replies this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• STALE5707d old filesystem label remaining after partition --add 'ed?
  2011-02-17 12:15 · 3 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5707d File system corruption during setting new size (native/extarnal metatdat) after expansion
  2011-02-17 10:27 · 4 replies this month · Kwolek, Adam <hidden>
• STALE5708d [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected
  2011-02-17 06:07 · 1 reply this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• STALE5689d [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
  2011-02-17 05:51 · 0 replies this month · NeilBrown <hidden>
• STALE5708d RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6
  2011-02-17 03:11 · 11 replies this month · Matt Tehonica <hidden>
• STALE5708d Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?
  2011-02-17 01:45 · 2 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5708d Automate on-going checks?
  2011-02-16 19:27 · 1 reply this month · Mark Knecht <hidden>
• STALE5708d md - cache
  2011-02-16 18:30 · 3 replies this month · Roberto Spadim <hidden>
• STALE5708d Re: write-behind has no measurable effect?
  2011-02-16 15:00 · 5 replies this month · Roberto Spadim <hidden>
• STALE5708d Linux tries to bring up raid before the disks are finished initializing
  2011-02-16 08:33 · 1 reply this month · Mike Myers <hidden>
• STALE5709d help with queue kernel information
  2011-02-16 03:43 · 1 reply this month · Roberto Spadim <hidden>
• STALE5709d Samsung HD204UI (2TB F4EG) disk vs smart
  2011-02-15 22:00 · 1 reply this month · Eyal Lebedinsky <hidden>
• STALE5709d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) [PATCH] dmaengine: add slave-dma maintainer
  2011-02-15 19:36 · 1 reply this month · Dan Williams <hidden>
• STALE5709d RAID10 failure(s)
  2011-02-15 17:47 · 8 replies this month · Mark Keisler <hidden>
• STALE5644d [PATCH 0/5] Level and chunk size migrations for imsm
  2011-02-15 10:12 · 11 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• STALE5710d failed to write superblock errors, and more!
  2011-02-15 04:24 · 1 reply this month · Jon Nelson <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems
  2011-02-15 03:14 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• STALE5710d write-behind has no measurable effect?
  2011-02-15 02:19 · 8 replies this month · Andras Korn <hidden>
• STALE5710d mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op - boot messages
  2011-02-15 02:16 · 5 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: RAID10 failure(s)
  2011-02-15 00:40 · 0 replies this month · Stan Hoeppner <hidden>
• STALE5710d mdadm: can't removed failed/detached drives when using metadata 1.x
  2011-02-15 00:05 · 3 replies this month · Rémi Rérolle <hidden>
• STALE5710d [PATCH] fix: detect container early in Create
  2011-02-14 22:37 · 4 replies this month · Czarnowska, Anna <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op - mdadm -Evv /dev/sd[abcde]2
  2011-02-14 20:49 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op – mdadm -D /dev/md1
  2011-02-14 20:48 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op - mdadm -Avv /dev/md1 /dev/sd[adbce]2
  2011-02-14 20:47 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• STALE5710d mdXX: bitmap superblock UUID mismatch
  2011-02-14 16:36 · 2 replies this month · Reynald Borer <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies raid10 failure(s)
  2011-02-14 16:07 · 0 replies this month · Mark Keisler <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Message ("Your message dated Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:16:47...")
  2011-02-14 10:45 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5711d Re: mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op - to ensure at least one email gets through!
  2011-02-14 06:35 · 1 reply this month · NeilBrown <hidden>
• STALE5711d [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 <-> Raid5 migrations (imsm)
  2011-02-14 01:21 · 5 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• STALE5711d [PATCH 0/4] Prepare mdadm for migrations (external meta)
  2011-02-14 00:17 · 5 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• STALE5711d mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op - to ensure at least one email gets through!
  2011-02-14 00:00 · 1 reply this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op: selected log entries
  2011-02-13 23:55 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op: mdstat
  2011-02-13 23:34 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op: mdadm -E -v -s
  2011-02-13 23:32 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op: mdadm -detail
  2011-02-13 23:31 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm: recovering from an aborted reshape op: mdadm -A -v --scan
  2011-02-13 23:29 · 0 replies this month · Gavin Flower <hidden>
• STALE5711d [PATCH] md: Detect raid1->raid0 takeover when comparing raid_disks
  2011-02-13 23:02 · 1 reply this month · Krzysztof Wojcik <hidden>
• STALE5711d [PATCH 1/2] fix: imsm: size must be in K for rounding to chunk
  2011-02-13 22:50 · 1 reply this month · Czarnowska, Anna <hidden>
• STALE5711d [PATCH 1/4] imsm: FIX: add raid5 to raid0 case to analyse_change()
  2011-02-13 22:26 · 4 replies this month · Adam Kwolek <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] md: Remove risk of overflow via sprintf) by using snprintf() in md_check_recovery()
  2011-02-13 20:53 · 0 replies this month · Bodo Eggert <hidden>
• STALE5711d [PATCH] md: Remove risk of overflow via sprintf) by using snprintf() in md_check_recovery()
  2011-02-13 20:20 · 4 replies this month · Jesper Juhl <hidden>
• STALE5711d Q re sync_completed
  2011-02-13 07:09 · 2 replies this month · Eyal Lebedinsky <hidden>