Re: Considering a complete rework of RAID on my home compute server
From: Roman Mamedov <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-06 00:47:54
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 198 bytes
From: Roman Mamedov <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-06 00:47:54
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:03:47 -0600 "Leslie Rhorer" [off-list ref] wrote:
RAID1 certainly offers the most robust solution, especially with more than 1 mirror.
RAID1 is as safe as it gets
Are you sure about that? Considering that mdadm's handling of corrupt data on RAID1 devices is pretty simplistic (obviously it does not have per-block checksums anywhere, it does not do 'voting' on RAID1 with more than 2 devices), it basically has no way of knowing if a block of data is returned differently by some of the component devices, which one has the 'correct' data. From what I understand, RAID5 and especially RAID6 give a much better protection in this situation. -- With respect, Roman