Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2010-11-24

Re: [PATCH] md: Call blk_queue_flush() to establish flush/fua support

From: Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
Date: 2010-11-23 01:28:37
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:50:00AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:22:08 -0800
"Darrick J. Wong" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Before 2.6.37, the md layer had a mechanism for catching I/Os with the barrier
flag set, and translating the barrier into barriers for all the underlying
devices.  With 2.6.37, I/O barriers have become plain old flushes, and the md
code was updated to reflect this.  However, one piece was left out -- the md
layer does not tell the block layer that it supports flushes or FUA access at
all, which results in md silently dropping flush requests.

Since the support already seems there, just add this one piece of bookkeeping
to restore the ability to flush writes through md.
I would rather just unconditionally call
   blk_queue_flush(mddev->queue, REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA);

I don't think there is much to be gained by trying to track exactly what the
underlying devices support, and as the devices can change, that is racy
anyway.

Thoughts?
I don't think there's anything that would get confused by an md that advertises
flush/fua support when any of the underlying devices don't support it, but that
was the only reason why I didn't just code it up your way to start with. :)

None of the in-kernel code checks queue->flush_flags except the block layer
itself, and the block layer silently strips off REQ_FLUSH/REQ_FUA if the device
doesn't support it.  I'm not sure I like /that/ behavior, but at the moment I
have no objection.  dm hardcodes the flags on as well.

--D
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help