Re: [PATCH] md: Call blk_queue_flush() to establish flush/fua support
From: Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
Date: 2010-11-23 01:28:37
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:50:00AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:22:08 -0800 "Darrick J. Wong" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Before 2.6.37, the md layer had a mechanism for catching I/Os with the barrier flag set, and translating the barrier into barriers for all the underlying devices. With 2.6.37, I/O barriers have become plain old flushes, and the md code was updated to reflect this. However, one piece was left out -- the md layer does not tell the block layer that it supports flushes or FUA access at all, which results in md silently dropping flush requests. Since the support already seems there, just add this one piece of bookkeeping to restore the ability to flush writes through md.I would rather just unconditionally call blk_queue_flush(mddev->queue, REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA); I don't think there is much to be gained by trying to track exactly what the underlying devices support, and as the devices can change, that is racy anyway. Thoughts?
I don't think there's anything that would get confused by an md that advertises flush/fua support when any of the underlying devices don't support it, but that was the only reason why I didn't just code it up your way to start with. :) None of the in-kernel code checks queue->flush_flags except the block layer itself, and the block layer silently strips off REQ_FLUSH/REQ_FUA if the device doesn't support it. I'm not sure I like /that/ behavior, but at the moment I have no objection. dm hardcodes the flags on as well. --D