Re: idr_get_new_exact ?
From: Steve Wise <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-20 20:08:03
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-i2c, linux-rdma, lkml, netdev
From: Steve Wise <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-20 20:08:03
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-i2c, linux-rdma, lkml, netdev
On 09/20/2010 02:31 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:11:31 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Occasionally, drivers care about the value that idr associates with their pointers. Today we have idr_get_new_above() which allocates a new idr entry above or equal to a given starting id, but sometimes drivers need to force an exact value. To overcome this small API gap, drivers are wrapping idr_get_new_above and then either BUG_ON() or just call idr_remove() and returns -EBUSY when idr allocates them an id which is different than their requested value. There are only a handful of users who need this (see below. especially note the i2c comment :), but it might be nice to have such an API (a bit less of code, and a bit less error prone). Would something like the below be desirable/acceptable ?It seems OK to me - it's an improvement over what we have now.
Looks ok to me also. This is exactly what cxgb* needs. IE the driver manages the ID space and never expects an idr insertion to fail because its already inserted. That constitutes a driver bug (which is why the BUG_ON() is there :)). Steve.