Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 7 authors, 2010-09-17

Re: [PATCH] md: do not use ++ in rcu_dereference() argument

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2010-09-15 12:28:43
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

On Tuesday 14 September 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
   The current version of the __rcu_access_pointer(),
__rcu_dereference_check(), and __rcu_dereference_protected() macros
evaluate their "p" argument three times, not counting typeof()s.  This is
bad news if that argument contains a side effect.  This commit therefore
evaluates this argument only once in normal kernel builds.  However, the
straightforward approach defeats sparse's RCU-pointer checking, so this
commit also adds a KBUILD_CHECKSRC symbol defined when running a checker. 
Therefore, when this new KBUILD_CHECKSRC symbol is defined, the additional
pair of evaluations of the "p" argument are performed in order to permit
sparse to detect misuse of RCU-protected pointers.
In general, I don't like the idea much because that means we're passing
semantically different code into sparse and gcc. Of course if my other
patch doesn't work, we might need to do it after all.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index f3bdff8..1c4984d 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ PERL                = perl
 CHECK          = sparse
 
 CHECKFLAGS     := -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix -D__unix__ \
-                 -Wbitwise -Wno-return-void $(CF)
+                 -Wbitwise -Wno-return-void -DKBUILD_CHECKSRC $(CF)
 CFLAGS_MODULE   =
 AFLAGS_MODULE   =
 LDFLAGS_MODULE  =
sparse already define __CHECKER__ itself, no need to define another symbol.
+#ifdef KBUILD_CHECKSRC
+#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space) \
+       ((void)(((typeof(*p) space *)p) == p))
+#else /* #ifdef KBUILD_CHECKSRC */
+#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space)
+#endif /* #else #ifdef KBUILD_CHECKSRC */
Did you see a problem with my macro?

#define rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space) \
       ((void)(((typeof(*p) space *)NULL) == ((typeof(p))NULL)))

I think this should warn in all the cases we want it to, but have no side-effects.
 #define __rcu_access_pointer(p, space) \
        ({ \
                typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
-               (void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
+               rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
                ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
        })
 #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
        ({ \
                typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
                rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
-               (void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
+               rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
                smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
                ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
        })
 #define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
        ({ \
                rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
-               (void) (((typeof (*p) space *)p) == p); \
+               rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
                ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
        })
 
This part might be useful in any case, to better document what the cast and
compare does, and to prevent the three users from diverging.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
index 439ddab..adb09cb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
This didn't seem to belong here.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help