Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2010-08-16

Re: RAID5 disk failure during rebuild of spare, any chance of recovery when one of the failed devices is suspected to be intact?

From: Tor Arne Vestbø <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-16 05:49:17

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø [off-list ref] wrote:
Thinking that since sdb1 was more or less intact it would be able to
jump in and work together with sdc1 and sde1 to form a degraded array
I could pull data off of.
Here's a paste of the mdadm -E state of things before this happened:

http://pastebin.com/f46EWXEA

I notice the event count has gone up since then, does this indicate
that sdb1 will be too old (non-fresh) to be usable?

Perhaps I'll have more luck assembling the array with the known-faulty
sdd1 with a little bit of file corruption, or perhaps it was just
failing temporarily and got kicked just to be safe?

Tor Arne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help