Re: [PATCH, RFC 2/2] dm: support REQ_FLUSH directly
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2010-08-30 08:40:20
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-scsi
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2010-08-30 08:40:20
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-scsi
On 08/30/2010 06:45 AM, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
Hi Mike, (08/27/10 23:13), Mike Snitzer wrote:quoted
quoted
If there will be no need for supporting a request-based target with num_flush_requests > 1, the special handling of flush can be removed. And since there is no such target in the current tree, I don't object if you remove that part of code for good reason.OK, certainly something to keep in mind. But _really_ knowing the multipath FLUSH+FUA performance difference (extra special-case code vs none) requires a full FLUSH conversion of request-based DM anyway. In general, request-based DM's barrier/flush code does carry a certain maintenance overhead. It is quite a bit of distracting code in the core DM which isn't buying us anything.. so we _could_ just remove it and never look back (until we have some specific need for num_flush_requestsquoted
1 in rq-based DM).So, I'm not objecting to your idea. Could you please create a patch to remove that?
I did that yesterday. Will post the patch soon. Thanks. -- tejun