Thread (109 messages) 109 messages, 19 authors, 2011-01-14

Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2010-08-23 12:36:37
Also in: dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-ide, linux-scsi, lkml

Hello,

On 08/20/2010 03:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Many storage devices, especially in the consumer market, come with volatile
write back caches.  That means the devices signal I/O completion to the
operating system before data actually has hit the physical medium.
A bit nit picky but flash devices can also have writeback caches and
the term physical medium sounds a bit off for those cases.  Maybe just
saying "non-volatile media" is better?
Implementation details for filesystems
--------------------------------------

Filesystem can simply set the REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA bits and do not have to
worry if the underlying devices need any explicit cache flushing and how
the Forced Unit Access is implemented.  The REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA flags
may both be set on a single bio.
It may be worthwhile to explain the sequence of operations when
REQ_FLUSH + data + REQ_FUA is executed.  It can be extrapolated from
the previous two descriptions but I think giving examples of different
sequences depending on FLUSH/FUA configuration would be helpful to
help understanding the overall picture of things.

Other than those, looks good to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help