Re: Another take on replacing failed raid drives
From: John Robinson <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-26 18:59:26
From: John Robinson <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-26 18:59:26
On 26/03/2010 15:06, John Hendrikx wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:quoted
I stumbled on this description of replacing a drive in a raid array. I share it because different takes on a subject are usesful, and because he had multiple arrays using partitions of the failed drive, rather than a partitioned array. http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1368I do that too (multiple arrays using partitions). My reason for that is to make future upgrades less painful as it is possible to just copy and drop one array at a time.
I do that too, but my reason is that the arrays are different types. For example, first partitions make RAID-1 for /boot, second partitions RAID-1 or RAID-10 swap, third partitions RAID-5 or RAID-6 filesystem (or several over LVM). Cheers, John.