Re: 4 partition raid 5 with 2 disks active and 2 spare, how to force?
From: Michael Evans <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-25 11:37:00
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Anshuman Aggarwal [off-list ref] wrote:
All, thanks in advance...particularly Neil.
My raid5 setup has 4 partitions, 2 of which are showing up as spare and 2 as active. The mdadm --assemble --force gives me the following error:
2 active devices and 2 spare cannot start device
it is a raid 5, with superblock 1.2, 4 devices in the order sda1, sdb5, sdc5, sdd5. I have lvm2 on top of this with other devices ...so as you all know data is irreplaceable blah blah.
I know that this device has not been written to for a while, so the data can be considered intact (hopefully all) if I can get the device to start up...but I'm not sure of the best way to coax the kernel to assemble it. Relevant information follows:
=== This device is working fine ===
mdadm --examine -e1.2 /dev/sdb5
/dev/sdb5:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x1
Array UUID : 42c56ea0:2484f566:387adc6c:b3f6a014
Name : GATEWAY:127 (local to host GATEWAY)
Creation Time : Sat Aug 22 09:44:21 2009
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Avail Dev Size : 586099060 (279.47 GiB 300.08 GB)
Array Size : 1758296832 (838.42 GiB 900.25 GB)
Used Dev Size : 586098944 (279.47 GiB 300.08 GB)
Data Offset : 272 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : f8ebb9f8:b447f894:d8b0b59f:ca8e98eb
Internal Bitmap : 2 sectors from superblock
Update Time : Fri Mar 19 00:56:15 2010
Checksum : 1005cfbc - correct
Events : 3796145
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Device Role : Active device 2
Array State : .AA. ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
=== This device is marked spare, can be marked active (IMHO) ===
mdadm --examine -e1.2 /dev/sdd5
/dev/sdd5:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x1
Array UUID : 42c56ea0:2484f566:387adc6c:b3f6a014
Name : GATEWAY:127 (local to host GATEWAY)
Creation Time : Sat Aug 22 09:44:21 2009
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Avail Dev Size : 586099060 (279.47 GiB 300.08 GB)
Array Size : 1758296832 (838.42 GiB 900.25 GB)
Used Dev Size : 586098944 (279.47 GiB 300.08 GB)
Data Offset : 272 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : 763a832f:1a9a7ea8:ce90d4a3:32e8ae54
Internal Bitmap : 2 sectors from superblock
Update Time : Fri Mar 19 00:56:15 2010
Checksum : c78aab46 - correct
Events : 3796145
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Device Role : spare
Array State : .AA. ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
=== This is the completely failed device (needs replacement) ===
mdadm --examine -e1.2 /dev/sda1
[HANGS!!]
I already have the replacement drive available as sde5 but want to be able to reconstruct as much as possible)
Thanks again,
Anshuman Aggarwal--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlYou have a raid 5 array. (drives then data+parity per drive as an example) 1234 123P 45P6 7P89 ... You are missing two drives, meaning you lack parity and 1 data stripe and have NO parity to recover it with. It's like seeing: .23. .5P. .P8. and expecting to somehow recover the missing data when it is no longer within the clean information. Your only hope is to assemble the array in read only mode with the other devices, if they can still even be read. In that case you might at least be able to recover nearly all of your data; hopefully any missing areas are in unimportant files or non-allocated space. At this point you should be EXTREMELY CAREFUL, and DO NOTHING, without having a good solid plan in place. Rushing /WILL/ cause you to loose data that might still potentially be recovered. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html