Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2010-02-03

Re: [PATCH 2/3] md: Add support for Raid5->Raid0 and Raid10->Raid0 takeover

From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2010-02-01 00:05:49

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:54:10 +0000
"Trela, Maciej" [off-list ref] wrote:

+static void *raid0_takeover_raid10(mddev_t *mddev)
+{
+	mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
+
+	/* Check layout: 
+	 *  assuming that far_copies is 1 and disks number is even 
+	 *  also all mirrors must be already degraded
+	 */
+	if ((mddev->layout >> 8) != 1) {
+	    printk(KERN_ERR "error: Raid0 cannot takover layout: %x\n", mddev->layout);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+	if (mddev->raid_disks & 1) {
+	    printk(KERN_ERR "error: Raid0 cannot takover Raid10 with odd disk number.\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+	if (mddev->degraded != (mddev->raid_disks>>1)) {
+	    printk(KERN_ERR "error: All mirrors must be already degraded!\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+	
+	/* Set new parameters */
+	mddev->new_level = 0;
+	mddev->raid_disks -= mddev->degraded;
+	mddev->delta_disks = -mddev->degraded;
+	mddev->degraded = 0;
+	/* make sure it will be not marked as dirty */
+	mddev->recovery_cp = MaxSector;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {	
+		rdev->raid_disk /= 2;
+	}

You assume here that near_copies is 2, but you never check for that.

Also - and this applies to raid5 and raid10 - the devices may not be all the
same size.  raid5 and raid10 will just use the size of the smallest device,
but raid0 won't.  For for a seamless conversion, you need to handle the case
that the devices are not the same size.  Either disallow that case, or make
use of the extra space.

NeilBrown

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help