Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2010-02-28

Re: mdadm software raid + ext4, capped at ~350MiB/s limitation/bug?

From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2010-02-27 21:01:10
Also in: linux-ext4, lkml

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:47:48 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello,

I have two separate systems and with ext4 I cannot get speeds greater than 
~350MiB/s when using ext4 as the filesystem on top of a raid5 or raid0. 
It appears to be a bug with ext4 (or its just that ext4 is slower for this
test)?

Each system runs 2.6.33 x86_64.
Could be related to the recent implementation of IO barriers in md.
Can you try mounting your filesystem with
   -o barrier=0

and see how that changes the result.

NeilBrown

Can someone please confirm?

Here is ext4:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=10240
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 29.8556 s, 360 MB/s

The result is the same regardless of the RAID type (RAID-5 or RAID-0)

Note, this is not a bandwidth problem:

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1M count=10240
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 17.6871 s, 607 MB/s

With XFS:

p63:~# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/md0
p63:~# mount /dev/md0 /r1
p63:~# cd /r1
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 17.6078 s, 610 MB/s

NOTE: With a HW raid controller (OR using XFS), I can get > 500 MiB/s, 
this problem only occurs with SW raid (Linux/mdadm).

Example (3ware 9650SE-16PML RAID-6, 15 drives (using EXT4)
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=10240
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 21.1729 s, 507 MB/s

Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help