Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 6 authors, 2010-02-01

Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5

From: Asdo <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-30 22:04:09

Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I think the 4k sector size on WD20EARS (for instance) is supposed to 
add more ECC information but I'm not sure how this will affect the 
10^14 error rate. I think the manufacturers need to work a bit more on 
it, I don't see how these drives can be used in single drive 
configuration with the current 10^14 value.

I don't have experience with any other drives than the WD20EADS but 
they develop read errors at a rate higher than any other drive I've 
experienced before....
We are thinking about buying a large number of WD2002FYPS RE4-GP for a 
large array (raid-6)

Anyone knows if the error rate is so high on those drives too?
Do they also use 4k sectors? Mikael, how do you find this out?

Is the 4k sectors a RMW emulation as written in
    http://lwn.net/Articles/322777/
or Linux sees them really as 4k block devices?
And if it's the second, were there side effects on this?

Thank you
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help