Re: Question about raid robustness when disk fails
From: Michał Sawicz <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-25 18:12:45
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 198 bytes
From: Michał Sawicz <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-25 18:12:45
Dnia 2010-01-25, pon o godzinie 18:51 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow pisze:
The only values I would keep a close eye on is remapped sectors and pending sectors. Anything else gives nice graphs but I always feel is totaly useless. And even the pending sectors are != 0 on one drive while badblocks reports no errors on repeated passes. The drive just doesn't seem to reduce the count when it successfully remaps a sector.
I read today that Samsungs show that behavior. Maybe this is the case? -- Cheers Michał (Saviq) Sawicz