Re: raid failure question
From: Thomas Fjellstrom <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-11 20:44:14
On Mon January 11 2010, Majed B. wrote:
Voltage spikes, disks heating (monitored by smartd) & sector corruption (monitored by smartd) are what I can think of for the time being.
Would that actually make it so a hot spare wouldn't get used automatically? I thought the point of a hot spare was to take over for a failed disk /no matter what/. Doesn't really make much sense is many of the more common error cases cause a hot spare to be ignored.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Tim Bock [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hello, Excluding the obvious multi-disk or bus failures, can anyone describe what type of disk failure a raid cannot detect/recover from? I have had two disk failures over the last three months, and in spite of having a hot spare, manual intervention was required each time to make the raid usable again. I'm just not sure if I'm not setting something up right, or if there is some other issue. Thanks for any comments or suggestions. Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Thomas Fjellstrom tfjellstrom@shaw.ca