Re: Raid10 layout
From: Erwan MAS <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-18 23:44:00
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:04:13PM +0000, Robin Hill wrote:
My understanding is that the layout should be (using your ordering): A C B D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 . . . . . . . . 4 1 2 3 8 5 6 7 . . . . . . . . Allowing the loss of A & B, or C & D. Is this not what you're seeing on-disk?
It's ok .
My error was in the compute of the offset , i starting from physical device size but i have
not include the bitmap .
So when i starting from array device size , it's ok .
--
____________________________________________________________
/ Erwan MAS /\
| mailto:erwan@mas.nom.fr |_/
___|________________________________________________________ |
\___________________________________________________________\__/