Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 9 authors, 2009-11-04

Re: unbelievably bad performance: 2.6.27.37 and raid6

From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-01 23:43:49

On Mon, November 2, 2009 6:41 am, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
On Sun November 1 2009, Andrew Dunn wrote:
quoted
Are we to expect some resolution in newer kernels?
I assume all of the new per-bdi-writeback work going on in .33+ will have
a
large impact. At least I'm hoping.
quoted
I am going to rebuild my array (backup data and re-create) to modify the
chunk size this week. I hope to get a much higher performance when
increasing from 64k chunk size to 1024k.

Is there a way to modify chunk size in place or does the array need to
be re-created?
This I'm not sure about. I'd like to be able to reshape to a new chunk
size
for testing.
Reshaping to a new chunksize is possible with the latest mdadm and kernel,
but I would recommend waiting for mdadm-3.1.1 and 2.6.32.
With the current code, a device failure during reshape followed by an
unclean shutdown while reshape is happening can lead to unrecoverable
data loss.  Even a clean shutdown before the shape finishes in that case
might be a problem.

NeilBrown
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help