Re: Disappointing RAID10 Performance
From: adfas asd <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-16 21:05:56
--- On Fri, 10/16/09, Rob Becker <Rob.Becker@riverbed.com> wrote:What command did you use to create your raid-10?
/ mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=raid1 --chunk=256 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb1 swap mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --chunk=256 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb2 /home mdadm --create /dev/md2 --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --chunk=1024 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb3 ... then copied files and later added the sda parts to the array. (RAID conversion on live system)
You might try running iostat in parallel to see if the read_balancer is properly balancing the reads between the two disks.
Don't understand this as I'm a bit of a n00b...
--- On Fri, 10/16/09, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org> wrote:If you only use your RAID-10 array for a single "dd if=bigfile of=/dev/null" then yes, it does not give you much over mirroring. If you start using your drives for two "dd if=bigfile[12] of=/dev/null" at the same time, you will notice the difference.
OK so it was a fallacy to think this would help with large files, unless more than one is involved.