Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

5 messages, 3 authors, 2009-09-18 · open the first message on its own page

Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

From: Sunpyo Hong <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-17 20:20:16

I’ve contacted just about everyone that knows a thing about RAID5, but no
one is really able to help me. Anyhow I’ve read up a lot on RAID5 arrays and
how to properly assemble them. However I’ve run into a problem with a NAS
system from WD that I just can’t seem to figure out.

I have a ¾ disks in the array, 1 went down and is out of commission. I’ve
been able to assemble my array through mdadm using –assemble –scan. However
I cannot access the array due to the fact that the array cannot read a
filesystem. Everytime I try to mount I get mount: wrong fs type
 etc. I know
that the FS is an ext3 FS. However I cannot seem to get this thing going. I
was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction with this. I
can’t seem to find anyone that is capable of solving this. I would
appreciate any help. Thanks!

-Sunpyo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

From: Robin Hill <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-17 21:01:48

On Thu Sep 17, 2009 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Sunpyo Hong wrote:
I've contacted just about everyone that knows a thing about RAID5, but no
one is really able to help me. Anyhow I've read up a lot on RAID5 arrays and
how to properly assemble them. However I've run into a problem with a NAS
system from WD that I just can't seem to figure out.

I have a ¾ disks in the array, 1 went down and is out of commission.  I've
been able to assemble my array through mdadm using --assemble --scan. However
I cannot access the array due to the fact that the array cannot read a
filesystem. Everytime I try to mount I get mount: wrong fs type
 etc. I
know that the FS is an ext3 FS. However I cannot seem to get this
thing going. I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right
direction with this. I can't seem to find anyone that is capable of
solving this. I would appreciate any help. Thanks!
What's the output of 'cat /proc/mdstat' after you assemble the array?
And what exact error (and dmesg output) do you get when trying to mount
it as ext3?

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        [off-list ref] |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |

Re: Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

From: Majed B. <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-17 21:26:41

This NAS from WD, does it use Linux's software RAID?
If not, you can't assemble it under Linux, because the RAID controller
is using proprietary methods.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Robin Hill [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu Sep 17, 2009 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Sunpyo Hong wrote:
quoted
I've contacted just about everyone that knows a thing about RAID5, but no
one is really able to help me. Anyhow I've read up a lot on RAID5 arrays and
how to properly assemble them. However I've run into a problem with a NAS
system from WD that I just can't seem to figure out.

I have a ¾ disks in the array, 1 went down and is out of commission.  I've
been able to assemble my array through mdadm using --assemble --scan. However
I cannot access the array due to the fact that the array cannot read a
filesystem. Everytime I try to mount I get mount: wrong fs type… etc. I
know that the FS is an ext3 FS. However I cannot seem to get this
thing going. I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right
direction with this. I can't seem to find anyone that is capable of
solving this. I would appreciate any help. Thanks!
What's the output of 'cat /proc/mdstat' after you assemble the array?
And what exact error (and dmesg output) do you get when trying to mount
it as ext3?

Cheers,
   Robin
--
    ___
   ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        [off-list ref] |
  / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
 // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |


-- 
       Majed B.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

From: Sunpyo Hong <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-17 21:46:33

First off, lemme tell you the initial problem. I had a WD ShareSpace that
had one of the disk go bad. They sent a replacement and it was suppose to
rebuild on its own, however after the build, the array went bad and it was
no longer able to see any of the files. 

I downloaded and tested the drives using windows data recovery tools I saw
that the ext3 was Linux FS and that using these tools would not help in the
recovery. However through the tools I was able to see and recover some of
the files, but the files themselves were usable. I confirmed with WD that
ext3 was in fact the FS and took steps to recover the data. These are the
steps I took in order for me to assemble the raid.

Right now I have 3/4 drives with the data. I did #mdadm --assemble --scan,
which let me assemble the raid. However at this point I was not able to see
any of the files or mount the drive to the mount point it was once at. I
have also tried #mdadm --create with the array in the right order /w the
missing disk. 

Initially the --assemble --scan assembled the array /dev/md2 with the disks
in the wrong order. I know because I physically saw where the disks were in
relation to the disk order and wrote down the disk order on every HD.

Here's everything I could find in terms of information that you asked for.
It's a lot.

#dmesg
[  339.440187] raid5: device sdb4 operational as raid disk 1
[  339.440189] raid5: device sdd4 operational as raid disk 3
[  339.440192] raid5: device sdc4 operational as raid disk 2
[  339.440610] raid5: allocated 4219kB for md2
[  339.440612] raid5: raid level 5 set md2 active with 3 out of 4 devices,
algorithm 2
[  339.440615] RAID5 conf printout:
[  339.440617]  --- rd:4 wd:3
[  339.440619]  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdb4
[  339.440620]  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdc4
[  339.440622]  disk 3, o:1, dev:sdd4
[  339.440817]  md2: unknown partition table
[  538.840033] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
[  538.891844] EXT3 FS on md0, internal journal
[  538.891849] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[  581.585031] VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem on dev md2.
[  587.056825] VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev md2.


#fdisk -l
WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk
doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.


Disk /dev/sda: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1               1      243202  1953514583+  ee  GPT

Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xdd07e5e3

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1               1          26      208844+  fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdb2              27         156     1044225   fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdb3             157         182      208845   fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdb4             183      243201  1952050117+  fd  Linux raid
autodetect

Disk /dev/sdc: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xdd07e5e4

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdc1               1          26      208844+  fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdc2              27         156     1044225   fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdc3             157         182      208845   fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdc4             183      243201  1952050117+  fd  Linux raid
autodetect

Disk /dev/sdd: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xdd07e5e2

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdd1               1          26      208844+  fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdd2              27         156     1044225   fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdd3             157         182      208845   fd  Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sdd4             183      243201  1952050117+  fd  Linux raid
autodetect

Disk /dev/md0: 213 MB, 213778432 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 52192 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table

Disk /dev/md2: 5996.6 GB, 5996697747456 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 1464037536 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Disk /dev/md2 doesn't contain a valid partition table


#cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
md2 : active raid5 sdb4[1] sdd4[3] sdc4[2]
      5856150144 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [_UUU]
      
md0 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdb1[2] sdc1[1]
      208768 blocks [4/3] [UUU_]
      

#cat /etc/fstab
aufs / aufs rw 0 0
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nosuid,nodev 0 0
/dev/sda2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sdc2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sdd2 swap swap defaults 0 0


#mount -t ext3 /dev/md2 /media/disk/shares
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md2,
       missing codepage or helper program, or other error
       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
       dmesg | tail  or so

#mdadm -Ds -v
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4 metadata=00.90
UUID=15e54255:f58be7ca:7f4a592f:038fedf2
   devices=/dev/sdd1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdb1
ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid5 num-devices=4 metadata=00.90
UUID=0b23d5e1:f5a27618:e368bf24:bd0fce41
   devices=/dev/sdb4,/dev/sdc4,/dev/sdd4

#mdadm -Es -v
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4
UUID=15e54255:f58be7ca:7f4a592f:038fedf2
   devices=/dev/sdd1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdb1
ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=4
UUID=57cd5e76:0d56f114:50bd5336:4477d020
   devices=/dev/sdd2,/dev/sdc2,/dev/sdb2
ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid5 num-devices=4
UUID=0b23d5e1:f5a27618:e368bf24:bd0fce41
   devices=/dev/sdd4,/dev/sdc4,/dev/sdb4

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robin Hill
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:02 PM
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

On Thu Sep 17, 2009 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Sunpyo Hong wrote:
I've contacted just about everyone that knows a thing about RAID5, but no
one is really able to help me. Anyhow I've read up a lot on RAID5 arrays
and
how to properly assemble them. However I've run into a problem with a NAS
system from WD that I just can't seem to figure out.

I have a ¾ disks in the array, 1 went down and is out of commission.  I've
been able to assemble my array through mdadm using --assemble --scan.
However
I cannot access the array due to the fact that the array cannot read a
filesystem. Everytime I try to mount I get mount: wrong fs type
 etc. I
know that the FS is an ext3 FS. However I cannot seem to get this
thing going. I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right
direction with this. I can't seem to find anyone that is capable of
solving this. I would appreciate any help. Thanks!
What's the output of 'cat /proc/mdstat' after you assemble the array?
And what exact error (and dmesg output) do you get when trying to mount
it as ext3?

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        [off-list ref] |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Raid 5 Issue, cannot recognize EXT3 File system.

From: Robin Hill <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-18 08:13:13

On Thu Sep 17, 2009 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Sunpyo Hong wrote:
First off, lemme tell you the initial problem. I had a WD ShareSpace that
had one of the disk go bad. They sent a replacement and it was suppose to
rebuild on its own, however after the build, the array went bad and it was
no longer able to see any of the files. 

I downloaded and tested the drives using windows data recovery tools I saw
that the ext3 was Linux FS and that using these tools would not help in the
recovery. However through the tools I was able to see and recover some of
the files, but the files themselves were usable. I confirmed with WD that
ext3 was in fact the FS and took steps to recover the data. These are the
steps I took in order for me to assemble the raid.

Right now I have 3/4 drives with the data. I did #mdadm --assemble --scan,
which let me assemble the raid. However at this point I was not able to see
any of the files or mount the drive to the mount point it was once at. I
have also tried #mdadm --create with the array in the right order /w the
missing disk. 

Initially the --assemble --scan assembled the array /dev/md2 with the disks
in the wrong order. I know because I physically saw where the disks were in
relation to the disk order and wrote down the disk order on every HD.
This should not be possible - --assemble will read the metadata from the
superblocks and determine the order the drives should be within the
array.  The physical positioning/ordering is irrelevant here.  I suggest
you recreate the array in the original order --assemble did (and hope
that the chunk size used is the default).
#cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
md2 : active raid5 sdb4[1] sdd4[3] sdc4[2]
      5856150144 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [_UUU]
      
md0 : active raid1 sdd1[0] sdb1[2] sdc1[1]
      208768 blocks [4/3] [UUU_]
      
I find it somewhat odd that md0 and md2 have the drives in a different
order.  Is this related to your recreating the array?  Admittedly, md0
is only a RAID1 so the order doesn't actually matter, but if the arrays
were created at the same time then the normal behaviour would be to use
the same order in the create command.

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        [off-list ref] |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help