Re: RAID1 assembled broken array

0.9 shouldn't be the default if 1.0 or 1.x is better anyway :/

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Matthias Urlichs [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:44 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

1.0 also protects from this problem.

So what's the best way to update a 0.9 superblock to 1.0 format?

mdadm --assemble --metadata=1.0 --update=summaries ... ?

I don't think you can.  You just have to create a new array with the
new superblock.

Hmm. Looks like you're right.

Consider this to be a feature request, then. If 1.0 is more reasonable
than 0.9, there should be a "safe" upgrade path.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
       Majed B.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html