On Wednesday September 23, hch@lst.de wrote:
It's a very awkward way to write out all data and wait for it, so just
call filemap_write_and_wait. I still can't figure what the point of
all this is, so a comment would surely be helpful.
When md/bitmap accesses a file, it uses bmap to find addresses and then
submit_bh to do IO, so it completely by-passes the page cache.
So this code is present to ensure that the page cache has no dirty
pages for the file before we start using the file.
I don't recall exactly why I used do_sync_mapping_range. I suspect
that I looked at what "sys_fsync" used (do_fsync?) and found that
wasn't exported, so I looked at what sys_sync_file_range used, found
that was exported, and so used that.
Looking at the current state of the VFS, I think I would rather use
vfs_fsync.
So would you be happy with something like the following?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
index 6986b00..60e2b32 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -1624,10 +1624,11 @@ int bitmap_create(mddev_t *mddev)
bitmap->offset = mddev->bitmap_offset;
if (file) {
get_file(file);
- do_sync_mapping_range(file->f_mapping, 0, LLONG_MAX,
- SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_BEFORE |
- SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE |
- SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER);
+ /* As future accesses to this file will use bmap,
+ * and bypass the page cache, we must sync the file
+ * first.
+ */
+ vfs_fsync(file, file->f_dentry, 1);
}
/* read superblock from bitmap file (this sets bitmap->chunksize) */
err = bitmap_read_sb(bitmap);