Thread (54 messages) flat view 54 messages, 19 authors, 2009-08-17

Re: Discard support (was Re: [PATCH] swap: send callback when swap slot is freed)

From: Mark Lord <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-17 20:19:42
Also in: linux-ide, linux-mm, linux-scsi, lkml

James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 14:21 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, James Bottomley[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:08 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
..
quoted
quoted
quoted
Non-coalescing is believed detrimental,
It is?  Why?
For the only compliant SSD in the wild, Mark has shown it to be true
via testing.
He only said larger trims take longer.  As I said previously, if it's a
X+nY relationship, then we still benefit from accumulation up to some
value of n.
..

Err, what I said was, "rm -rf /usr/src/linux" takes over half an hour
with uncoalesced TRIM, and only a scant few seconds in total *with*
coalesced TRIM.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help