Re: Discard support (was Re: [PATCH] swap: send callback when swap slot is freed)

jim owens wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

quoted

I assume that it really is artificial, rather than the device really being ready for another operation (other than another TRIM). I lack the hardware, but the test would be the time to complete a read, trim and read, and two trim and read operations. Just my thought that the TRIM in progress may only block the next TRIM, rather than other operations.

I don't know his test sequence but READ is not the likely command
before and after TRIM unless we are talking about TRIM being issued
only in delayed host garbage collection.  Filesystems send WRITES
during delete.

My idea is to test using a command which will definitely not need to prepare the media before completion, thus read. If TRIM doesn't block reads, then NCQ may allow reads to take place. Because of buffering slow reads hurt more than slow writes in terms of user perception.

-- 
bill davidsen [off-list ref]
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc

"You are disgraced professional losers. And by the way, give us our money back."
   - Representative Earl Pomeroy,  Democrat of North Dakota
on the A.I.G. executives who were paid bonuses  after a federal bailout.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>