Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 9 authors, 2009-06-03

Re: Awful RAID5 random read performance

From: Maurice Hilarius <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-02 15:14:39

Wil Reichert wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Maurice Hilarius [off-list ref] wrote:
  
quoted
Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
    
quoted
..
Yet I've heard NCQ makes some things worse. Some raid tweaking pages tell
you to try disabling NCQ.

      
Not so relevant here.
This recommendation to  disable drive NCQ is generally due tot he fact that
NCQ implementations by various manufacturers tend
to differ in behaviour, and, in some cases , is just plain "broken".
    
Not trying to start a flamewar on whos hardware is better, but I'd
love to get clarification on that last statement.  I've always been
under the impression Intel gets their NCQ right (works for me).  All
the reviews I've read on the current set of AMD southbridges indicate
they don't but I've no personal experience there.  No idea about
nvidia or the cheap add-in sata cards like Silicon Image.

Wil
  
 From speaking with hardware RAID card manufacturers support engineers 
over the past few years,
there have been several instances where NCQ implementations were 
incomplete, or faulty, or both.

This seems to have improved a lot over the last year or two, so I think 
it is likely now "OK".

However, from the earlier history  I think there is a tendency for 
people now to assume it is "broken",
and to turn it off.


-- 
Regards, Maurice
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help