Re: Awful RAID5 random read performance
From: John Robinson <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-01 12:01:57
From: John Robinson <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-01 12:01:57
On 31/05/2009 18:19, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
John Robinson [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Clearly when you're doing this over 4 drives you can have ~400 seeks/second but that's still limiting you to ~400 reads/second for smallish block sizes.Note that that only holds true for writes or multithreaded reads. Reading from a single thread will randomly pick one drive (depending on where it wants to read), wait for it to seek, read one block of data and repeat. So you get the speed of a single drive no matter how many drives there are in the raid.
Sure, that's why I said "can", but I thought iozone was multi-threaded. Maybe it needs an option specified, in which case using more threads than there are discs would be a good idea. Cheers, John.