Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2009-06-02

Re: RAID5 reconstruction ?

From: SandeepKsinha <hidden>
Date: 2009-05-31 08:02:03

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Redeeman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 20:55 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
quoted
Redeeman [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 14:35 +0100, John Robinson wrote:
quoted
On 30/05/2009 06:44, SandeepKsinha wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Say If I have a RAID 5 array of 50GB of five disks of 10GB each.

I have data of 5GB. When a disk fails and replaced with a spare disk.
Will the reconstruction happen only for the 5GB allocated disk blocks
or it will happen for the whole disk size.
The whole disc size, for now anyway; md does not currently note which
blocks have been used by its client (the filesystem, LVM, whatever).
quoted
Is it possible to make  reconstruction intelligent enough to keep it optimized ?
This has been discussed in combination with supporting SSD drives' TRIM
function, and would mean md had to keep track of used chunks or possibly
even sectors using a bitmap or something like that, but whether anyone's
working on it I don't know.
I would say it should be possible to 'query' the filesystem for that
information. Obviously this will only work if you run a filesystem on it
which supports it, but it would seem like a nicer solution than a bitmap
for it.
quoted
Cheers,

John.
And just when I hit send I thought of something else.

Instead of the initial sync when creating a raid the bitmap could just
mark all blocks as unused. Much faster raid creation.

This really sounds like a good option. This would have a slight hit
for writes which I believe will compensate for later re-constructions,
replacing a disk, mirror resysnc and many more operation.

Neil any comments on this?

I mean, how difficult would it be to maintain such a bitmap. This can
though of making something optional as this will incur space.

A filesystem-coexist mode could also do this, by simply refusing
operation until such a time that a filesystem is detected, or i suppose
in worst case, mounted...
quoted
MfG
        Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Regards,
Sandeep.





 	
“To learn is to change. Education is a process that changes the learner.”
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help