On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:32:53AM -0400, Maxime Boissonneault wrote:

Robin Hill a écrit :

quoted

On Mon May 25, 2009 at 01:05:15PM -0400, Maxime Boissonneault wrote:

  

quoted

Hello,
I am using Ubuntu Hardy with 3x500GB drives and the following RAID
configuration :

/boot is on a 100MB RAID1
/ is on a 30GB RAID0
/home is on a 906GB RAID5

    

Ouch - why RAID0 for /?  If you lose a single drive then all the
configuration, etc. is down the drain.  I'd suggest rethinking this
while you're going through the rebuild process anyway.

  

That is why I do backups of / on /home regularily. I first did a RAID0  
for performance. I did some testing on performance of RAID0,1,5 and  
RAID1 was pretty lousy (I put the results of my tests here :  
http://cqed.physique.usherbrooke.ca/~mboisson/htpc.php?sec=raid_test )
I guess I should have used a RAID5, but RAID1 seems like a terrible idea  
considering the really bad performances.

Hmm, why not use raid10,f2 for the / system?
Then you will get almost raid0 read performance, while write performance
is about half of raid0.

A setup is described in
http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Preventing_against_a_failing_disk

You can do the / system with raid10,f2 with just 2 disks.

Best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html