On Friday May 15, maan@systemlinux.org wrote:
As mentioned by Neil, the raid0 hash table does probably not add
any value and contains some rather strange code that manipulates the
various sector counts needed to maintain this table.
This patch series against Neil's for-next tree as of yesterday removes
the hash table from the raid0 code.
Thanks.
All applied, and pushed out to
git://neil.brown.name/md for-next
I've added a couple more patches to remove a couple of fields from
struct strip_zone. I'll post them shortly for comment.
And thanks for finding the memory leak!
NeilBrown