linux-raid archive · May 2009

549 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• STALE6261d Awful RAID5 random read performance
  2009-05-31 18:26 · 6 replies this month · Maurice Hilarius <hidden>
• STALE6263d Re: Awful RAID5 random read performance
  2009-05-31 17:19 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6262d Re: RAID5 reconstruction ?
  2009-05-31 12:14 · 2 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6264d Re: Events?
  2009-05-31 08:12 · 2 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6264d Re: RAID5 reconstruction ?
  2009-05-31 08:10 · 1 reply this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6262d Re: RAID5 reconstruction ?
  2009-05-31 08:02 · 2 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6261d Re: Upgrading a software RAID
  2009-05-31 05:21 · 14 replies this month · Maxime Boissonneault <hidden>
• STALE6265d Re: RAID-5 spare drive: Can't make spare persist across reboot
  2009-05-31 00:31 · 3 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6261d Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] md: personality pushdown patches -- intro
  2009-05-30 22:19 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Events?
  2009-05-30 19:45 · 0 replies this month · Leslie Rhorer <hidden>
• STALE6262d slow random raid5 access?
  2009-05-30 19:44 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Fjellstrom <hidden>
• STALE6256d RAID5 reconstruction ?
  2009-05-30 18:39 · 10 replies this month · SandeepKsinha <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RAID-5 spare drive: Can't make spare persist across reboot
  2009-05-30 18:37 · 0 replies this month · David Rea <hidden>
• STALE6265d Raid and badblocks
  2009-05-30 14:21 · 7 replies this month · Jeremy Sanders <hidden>
• STALE6266d [PATCH/RFC 0/2] md: personality pushdown patches -- intro
  2009-05-29 20:49 · 3 replies this month · Andre Noll <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Need information regarding RAID 6 Async APIs for kernel version 2.6.27
  2009-05-29 19:13 · 0 replies this month · Dan Williams <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 11/11] async_tx: raid6 recovery self test
  2009-05-29 13:45 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 09/11] async_tx: add support for asynchronous RAID6 recovery operations
  2009-05-29 13:44 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 10/11] dmatest: add pq support
  2009-05-29 13:44 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• STALE6261d RE: [PATCH v2 08/11] async_tx: add support for asynchronous GF multiplication
  2009-05-29 13:44 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 06/11] async_tx: add sum check flags
  2009-05-29 13:44 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 07/11] async_tx: kill needless module_{init|exit}
  2009-05-29 13:43 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 04/11] async_xor: permit callers to pass in a 'dma/page scribble' region
  2009-05-29 13:43 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• STALE6261d RE: [PATCH v2 03/11] async_tx: structify submission arguments, add scribble
  2009-05-29 13:43 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• STALE6261d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 02/11] async_tx: kill ASYNC_TX_DEP_ACK flag
  2009-05-29 13:42 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• STALE6261d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) RE: [PATCH v2 01/11] async_tx: rename zero_sum to val
  2009-05-29 13:42 · 0 replies this month · Sosnowski, Maciej <hidden>
• STALE6267d forcing check of RAID1 arrays causes lockup
  2009-05-28 23:25 · 4 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE6267d Need information regarding RAID 6 Async APIs for kernel version 2.6.27
  2009-05-28 22:56 · 1 reply this month · Koti <hidden>
• STALE6238d Re: [RFC PATCH] dm-csum: A new device mapper target that checks data integrity
  2009-05-28 19:30 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-28 19:07 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: raid failure and LVM volume group availability
  2009-05-28 18:48 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6267d RE: resync duration ?
  2009-05-28 16:43 · 4 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6267d Adaptec 2405 : hardware or software raid?
  2009-05-28 14:14 · 6 replies this month · Janek Kozicki <hidden>
• STALE6267d Western Digital RE3
  2009-05-28 13:29 · 9 replies this month · MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets] <hidden>
• STALE6267d FW: Detecting errors on the RAID disks.
  2009-05-28 08:19 · 2 replies this month · Simon Jackson <hidden>
• STALE6268d Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-27 21:55 · 2 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Western Digital RE3
  2009-05-27 15:15 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE6268d Re: [PATCH 0/6] md: More sector_t conversions -- intro
  2009-05-27 08:02 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6269d [RFC PATCH] dm-csum: A new device mapper target that checks data integrity
  2009-05-26 19:51 · 3 replies this month · Alberto Bertogli <hidden>
• STALE6269d Re: [RFC PATCH] dm-csum: A new device mapper target that checks data integrity
  2009-05-26 12:56 · 1 reply this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: raid failure and LVM volume group availability
  2009-05-26 11:56 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-26 11:51 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-26 11:17 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: raid failure and LVM volume group availability
  2009-05-26 11:05 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE2369d How to un-degrade an array after a totally spurious failure?
  2009-05-26 10:47 · 3 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PULL REQUEST] md - various fixed for 2.6.30
  2009-05-26 03:06 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 0/6] md: More sector_t conversions -- intro
  2009-05-26 02:40 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 4/6] md: convert conf->chunk_size and conf->prev_chunk to sectors.
  2009-05-25 23:14 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 1/6] md: Make mddev->chunk_size sector-based.
  2009-05-25 23:02 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-25 22:14 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6270d Re: [RFC PATCH] dm-csum: A new device mapper target that checks data integrity
  2009-05-25 17:49 · 1 reply this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6270d raid failure and LVM volume group availability
  2009-05-25 16:09 · 2 replies this month · Tim Connors <hidden>
• STALE6270d [PATCH 0/6] md: More sector_t conversions -- intro
  2009-05-25 13:40 · 8 replies this month · Andre Noll <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: LVM->RAID->LVM
  2009-05-25 12:32 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: raid failure and LVM volume group availability
  2009-05-25 12:15 · 0 replies this month · Goswin von Brederlow <hidden>
• STALE6261d [PATCH v2 00/11] Asynchronous raid6 acceleration (part 1 of 3)
  2009-05-25 07:55 · 25 replies this month · Dan Williams <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [md PATCH 1/3] md: improve errno return when setting array_size
  2009-05-25 04:33 · 0 replies this month · NeilBrown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [md PATCH 2/3] md: bitmap: improve bitmap maintenance code.
  2009-05-25 04:33 · 0 replies this month · NeilBrown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [md PATCH 3/3] md: export 'frozen' resync state through sysfs
  2009-05-25 04:33 · 0 replies this month · NeilBrown <hidden>
• STALE6271d LVM->RAID->LVM
  2009-05-24 19:46 · 1 reply this month · Billy Crook <hidden>
• STALE6271d Missing md superblock on added devices after grow ...
  2009-05-24 18:06 · 4 replies this month · rdc <hidden>
• STALE6272d Re: Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-23 22:33 · 4 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6272d internal write-intent bitmap, chunksize, superblock
  2009-05-23 21:07 · 1 reply this month · Redeeman <hidden>
• STALE6273d Re: Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap?
  2009-05-22 23:00 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Upgrading a RAID configuration
  2009-05-22 17:15 · 0 replies this month · mboisson <hidden>
• STALE6273d [PATCH] md: Protecting mddev with barriers to avoid races
  2009-05-22 13:41 · 5 replies this month · SandeepKsinha <hidden>
• STALE6273d Does raid5 have error handling while reading?
  2009-05-22 11:21 · 3 replies this month · Xu Yuehai <hidden>
• STALE6274d [PATCH 0/3] Asynchronous raid6 acceleration (part 2 of 3)
  2009-05-21 19:04 · 3 replies this month · Dan Williams <hidden>
• STALE6274d Re: "raid array not clean" messages
  2009-05-21 18:38 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6274d Re: Starting RAID 5
  2009-05-21 18:27 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6274d Re: Subject: [PATCH 006/009]: raid1: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-21 13:32 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [PATCH 006/009]: raid1: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-21 11:33 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: How to un-degrade an array after a totally spurious failure?
  2009-05-21 07:32 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE6275d "raid array not clean" messages
  2009-05-21 05:11 · 4 replies this month · fibre raid <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: [PATCH] md: Enhancements and clean to linear RAID
  2009-05-21 03:47 · 4 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject [ md PATCH 4/6] : md to support page size chunks in the case of raid 0
  2009-05-21 03:13 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: linear raid : mddev not protected in linear_add
  2009-05-20 22:35 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6275d Starting RAID 5
  2009-05-20 19:45 · 5 replies this month · Leslie Rhorer <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: linear raid : mddev not protected in linear_add
  2009-05-20 16:10 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: Subject: [PATCH 002/009]: have raid0 report its formation
  2009-05-20 13:50 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: Subject: [PATCH 006/009]: raid1: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-20 13:50 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: Subject [ md PATCH 4/6] : md to support page size chunks in the case of raid 0
  2009-05-20 13:46 · 2 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: Subject [ raid0 PATCH 3/6] : Add support to chunk size of 4K*n instead of 4K*2^n
  2009-05-20 08:03 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6275d Re: Subject [ md PATCH 4/6] : md to support page size chunks in the case of raid 0
  2009-05-20 07:51 · 2 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [PATCH 004/009]: md. chunk size check
  2009-05-20 01:43 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [PATCH 007/009]: raid10: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-20 01:41 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [PATCH 008/009]: raid5: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-20 01:39 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [PATCH 003/009]: raid0 :Enables chunk size other than 4K.
  2009-05-20 01:38 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Subject: [PATCH 001/009]: have raid0 compile with MD_DEBUG on
  2009-05-20 01:26 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6276d Subject: [001/002 ] raid0 reshape
  2009-05-19 22:27 · 2 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Iron hot-rod forever!
  2009-05-19 21:56 · 0 replies this month · Anthony Swain <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 007/009]: raid10: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-19 16:10 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 007/009]: raid10: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-19 16:10 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 007/009]: raid10: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-19 16:10 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 004/009]: md. chunk size check
  2009-05-19 16:09 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 002/009]: have raid0 report its formation
  2009-05-19 16:09 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 007/009]: raid10: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-19 16:09 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 004/009]: md. chunk size check
  2009-05-19 16:08 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 007/009]: raid10: chunk size check in run
  2009-05-19 16:08 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Subject: [PATCH 002/009]: have raid0 report its formation
  2009-05-19 16:07 · 0 replies this month · raz ben yehuda <hidden>