Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2009-03-28

Re: 2.6.29 - raid10 issue - spares do not get synched automatically

From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-28 22:44:58

On Sun, March 29, 2009 9:21 am, Patrick Ringl wrote:
Hello Neil,

NeilBrown wrote:
quoted
Linux RAID10 with

     Raid Level : raid10
   Raid Devices : 4
         Layout : near=2, far=1

Will layout data like this:

   disk0   disk1   disk2   disk3
     A       A       B       B
     C       C       D       D
     E       E       F       F

You have removed disk0 and disk1, so A,C,E don't exist
any more.  You should get IO errors when you try to access
that data.
Sorry, but I removed loop0 and loop2 so that would be disk0 and disk2 -
so ACE as well as BDF should still exist and recover. Could you explain
this, I am I just getting you wrong?
From the Pastezone thing...
-----------------------------------------------------
    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       7        2        0      active sync   /dev/loop2
       1       7        0        1      active sync   /dev/loop0
       2       7        1        2      active sync   /dev/loop1
       3       7        3        3      active sync   /dev/loop3
pari:/mnt/debian# mdadm --manage /dev/md0 -f /dev/loop2
mdadm: set /dev/loop2 faulty in /dev/md0
pari:/mnt/debian# mdadm --manage /dev/md0 -f /dev/loop0
mdadm: set /dev/loop0 faulty in /dev/md0
---------------------------------------------------

So while you did remove loop0 and loop2, these were disk1 and disk0.

NeilBrown

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help