Re: some ?? re failed disk and resyncing of array
From: <hidden>
Date: 2009-02-02 01:47:53
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:41:37 -0500, "Bill Davidsen" [off-list ref] said:
whollygoat@letterboxes.org wrote:quoted
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:38:22 +0000, "David Greaves" [off-list ref] said:quoted
whollygoat@letterboxes.org wrote:quoted
On a boot a couple of days ago, mdadm failed a disk and started resyncing to spare (raid5, 6 drives, 5 active, 1 spare). smartctl -H <disk> returned info (can't remember the exact text) that made me suspect the drive was fine, but the data connection was bad. Sure enough the data cable was damaged. Replaced the cable and smartctl sees the disk just fine and reports no errors. - I'd like to readd the drive as a spare. Is it enough to "mdadm --add /dev/hdk" or do I need to prep the drive to remove any data that said where it previously belonged in the array?That should work. Any issues and you can zero the superblock (man mdadm) No need to zero the disk.Would --re-add be better?I don't think do. And I would zero the superblock. The more detail you put into preventing unwanted autodetection the fewer learning experiences you will have.
Will do
quoted
fly:~# mdadm -D /dev/md0
[snip]
quoted
Raid Devices : 5 Total Devices : 5 Preferred Minor : 0 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Intent Bitmap : Internal Update Time : Fri Jan 30 15:52:01 2009 State : active Active Devices : 5 Working Devices : 5 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0
[snip]
quoted
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 33 1 0 active sync /dev/hde1 1 34 1 1 active sync /dev/hdg1 2 56 1 2 active sync /dev/hdi1 5 89 1 3 active sync /dev/hdo1 6 88 1 4 active sync /dev/hdm1 fly:~# mdadm -E /dev/hdo1
[snip]
quoted
Array Slot : 5 (0, 1, 2, failed, failed, 3, 4) Array State : uuuUu 2 failed --------- end output ------------- Why does the "Array Slot" field show 7 slots? And why does the field "Array State" show 2 failed? There ever only were 6 disks in the array. Only one of those is currently missing. mdadm -D above doesn't list any failed devices in the "Failed Devices" field.No idea, but did you explicitly remove the failed drive? Was there a failed drive at some time in the past?
No explicit removal. Maybe I should have. I let it rebuild then shutdown to see if it was just something like cabling. After dealing with the cabling problem and rebooting mdadm -D didn't show any failed drives, just as above, so it never occurred to me to remove the drive. Is there anything I can do to fix the information reported by mdadm -E <component device>? Maybe when I add the old drive as the new spare it will be taken care of? Thanks, wg -- whollygoat@letterboxes.org -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be