Re: RAID 5 Recovery Help Needed
From: Mike Berger <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-17 18:51:07
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Depending on your distribution, I would not be surprised to see your array assemble just fine with or without an ARRAY line, it seems some try harder than others and I just noticed that the system I use most has only "super minor" lines for the first three arrays and nothing for the rest, yet arrays 0..6 all come up at boot. However, the bad news is that many distributions don't do ext4 very well, and may mount an ext4 file system as ext3, resulting in damage which gets worse if you write to it. I would suggest starting the array, unmounted, running fsck.ext4 on the array, and seeing if it offers any hope of recovery. If so, after the fsck mount the array *read-only* and see what's there. Some distributions seem to need "ext4" on the boot command line to detect the file system type for mounting. Of course if it's in fstab it should work correctly, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it. -- Bill Davidsen [off-list ref] "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
I have an ext4 partition on another drive working flawlessly, so I don't think it is or was being mounted incorrectly as ext3. I have a feeling the ext4 boot option is needed for the root partition in the cases you mention. Thanks for the suggestions. I've tried a dry run (-n) of fsck without success, but put off doing a full fsck for fear of corrupting the data were it to be recoverable. I will try the full fsck before abandoning all hope. Mike