On 20/11/2008 11:59, Justin Piszcz wrote:

Someone had submitted a patch to correct part of the problem I was 
mentioning earlier, while it may be trivial, do you and others think it 
would be worthwhile to print "raid6" when it is a raid6 rather than 
printing raid5 for most messages in the kernel?

Alternatively, if the same code is used for all of RAID 4/5/6, perhaps 
the simplest thing would be for the messages just to say "raid456".

Cheers,

John.