Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2008-06-25

Re: How to avoid complete rebuild of RAID 6 array (6/8 active devices)

From: Andre Noll <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-25 16:13:57

On 15:37, Dave Moon wrote:
1. If mdadm encounters a bit error during a RAID 6 rebuild, will it  
just give up on that particular file and move on to recover other data  
on the array? Or will it trash the entire array?
The kernel will stop the array and give up.
2. Is it possible to cheat mdadm by somehow replacing the new "raid  
metadata" on the 6 drives with the old data on the 2 drives? Will it  
make mdadm think the array is clean, consistent and nothing ever  
happened?
Please do note that I did not write ANY new data onto the RAID 6 array  
from the time it was degraded until the time I brought it down with (-- 
stop).
Use --force, Luke. Man mdadm(8):

	-f, --force Assemble the array even if some superblocks
	appear out-of-date

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help