On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:50 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:

On Thu, 1 May 2008, Alex Davis wrote:

quoted

Is this a bad thing? I'm guessing that it is, but I want independent
confirmation before I spoke to someone I know who's doing this.

Thanks


     ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

What is the use case, why would you want to do that?
I have seen people on the list do it before, for example are you going to 
be utilizing both raids at the same time?  If so, I would advise against 
it.

What is the reasoning?

I do this!

is this really bad? i would surely like a list of reasons why..

I do it because.. well.. first off, it allows me to have /boot on
different raidlevel than / or /home without extra disks.
secondly, it allows me to with the same disks use different
filesystems.. for instance, it allows me to have /home encrypted with
dm-crypt, while still raided.. Not that i would mind encrypting /
and /home as 1 partition, but it creates a whole slew of issues with
having to create initrd and stuff..

I realize that performance probably suffers abit from this, but well..
is there any stability or security wise risk? i mostly use raid1 and
raid5 only..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/