Re: Severe slowdown with LVM on RAID, alignment problem?
From: Michael Guntsche <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-29 08:12:01
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:53:06 -0700, Maurice Hilarius [off-list ref] wrote:
Michael Guntsche wrote:quoted
.. While the result for XFS is different, reading is actually faster, the differnece between xfs and xfs on lvm is still there.Great. At least now the figures are more realistic.
quoted
pvcreate was called so that the first PE starts exactly at 256K, no
sunits
quoted
where used with mkfs.xfs for the lvm case. I still do not understand the read output at all.That is certainly a puzzle.
Is it possible that my computer is just too slow to get good read results?
I wonder since writing seems to be nearly similar.
I just tried with an ext3 FS.
Version 1.03c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec
%CP
lvm-al8g-ext3 8G 45029 27 22436 29 55034 45 192.0
3
While reading is a little bit faster it's nowhere near the speed I get on
md0 itself.
Kind regards,
Michael