Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 5 authors, 2008-02-06

Re: raid10 on three discs - few questions.

From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-03 23:11:27

On Sunday February 3, janek_listy@wp.pl wrote:
Hi,

Maybe I'll buy three HDDs to put a raid10 on them. And get the total
capacity of 1.5 of a disc. 'man 4 md' indicates that this is possible
and should work.

I'm wondering - how a single disc failure is handled in such configuration?

1. does the array continue to work in a degraded state?
Yes.
2. after the failure I can disconnect faulty drive, connect a new one,
   start the computer, add disc to array and it will sync automatically?
Yes.
Question seems a bit obvious, but the configuration is, at least for
me, a bit unusual. This is why I'm asking. Anybody here tested such
configuration, has some experience?


3. Another thing - would raid10,far=2 work when three drives are used?
   Would it increase the read performance?
Yes.
4. Would it be possible to later '--grow' the array to use 4 discs in
   raid10 ? Even with far=2 ?
No.

Well.... if by "later" you mean "in five years", then maybe.  But the
code doesn't currently exist.

NeilBrown
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help