Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2008-01-09

Re: 2.6.24-rc6 reproducible raid5 hang

From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2008-01-09 18:28:50
Subsystem: block layer, software raid (multiple disks) support, the rest · Maintainers: Jens Axboe, Song Liu, Yu Kuai, Linus Torvalds

On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 10:58 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
quoted
On Dec 29, 2007 1:58 PM, dean gaudet [off-list ref] wrote: 
quoted
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Dan Williams wrote: 
quoted
On Dec 29, 2007 9:48 AM, dean gaudet [off-list ref] wrote: 
quoted
hmm bummer, i'm doing another test (rsync 3.5M inodes from another box) on 
the same 64k chunk array and had raised the stripe_cache_size to 1024... 
and got a hang.  this time i grabbed stripe_cache_active before bumping 
the size again -- it was only 905 active.  as i recall the bug we were 
debugging a year+ ago the active was at the size when it would hang.  so 
this is probably something new. 
I believe I am seeing the same issue and am trying to track down 
whether XFS is doing something unexpected, i.e. I have not been able 
to reproduce the problem with EXT3.  MD tries to increase throughput 
by letting some stripe work build up in batches.  It looks like every 
time your system has hung it has been in the 'inactive_blocked' state 
i.e. > 3/4 of stripes active.  This state should automatically 
clear... 
cool, glad you can reproduce it :) 

i have a bit more data... i'm seeing the same problem on debian's 
2.6.22-3-amd64 kernel, so it's not new in 2.6.24. 
This is just brainstorming at this point, but it looks like xfs can 
submit more requests in the bi_end_io path such that it can lock 
itself out of the RAID array.  The sequence that concerns me is: 

return_io->xfs_buf_end_io->xfs_buf_io_end->xfs_buf_iodone_work->xfs_buf_iorequest->make_request-><hang> 

I need verify whether this path is actually triggering, but if we are 
in an inactive_blocked condition this new request will be put on a 
wait queue and we'll never get to the release_stripe() call after 
return_io().  It would be interesting to see if this is new XFS 
behavior in recent kernels.

i have evidence pointing to d89d87965dcbe6fe4f96a2a7e8421b3a75f634d1

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d89d87965dcbe6fe4f96a2a7e8421b3a75f634d1

which was Neil's change in 2.6.22 for deferring generic_make_request 
until there's enough stack space for it.

with my git tree sync'd to that commit my test cases fail in under 20 
minutes uptime (i rebooted and tested 3x).  sync'd to the commit previous 
to it i've got 8h of run-time now without the problem.

this isn't definitive of course since it does seem to be timing 
dependent, but since all failures have occured much earlier than that 
for me so far i think this indicates this change is either the cause of 
the problem or exacerbates an existing raid5 problem.

given that this problem looks like a very rare problem i saw with 2.6.18 
(raid5+xfs there too) i'm thinking Neil's commit may just exacerbate an 
existing problem... not that i have evidence either way.

i've attached a new kernel log with a hang at d89d87965d... and the 
reduced config file i was using for the bisect.  hopefully the hang 
looks the same as what we were seeing at 2.6.24-rc6.  let me know.
Dean could you try the below patch to see if it fixes your failure
scenario?  It passes my test case.

Thanks,
Dan

------->
md: add generic_make_request_immed to prevent raid5 hang

From: Dan Williams <redacted>

Commit d89d87965dcbe6fe4f96a2a7e8421b3a75f634d1 reduced stack utilization
by preventing recursive calls to generic_make_request.  However the
following conditions can cause raid5 to hang until 'stripe_cache_size' is
increased:

1/ stripe_cache_active is N stripes away from the 'inactive_blocked' limit
   (3/4 * stripe_cache_size)
2/ a bio is submitted that requires M stripes to be processed where M > N
3/ stripes 1 through N are up-to-date and ready for immediate processing,
   i.e. no trip through raid5d required

This results in the calling thread hanging while waiting for resources to
process stripes N through M.  This means we never return from make_request.
All other raid5 users pile up in get_active_stripe.  Increasing
stripe_cache_size temporarily resolves the blockage by allowing the blocked
make_request to return to generic_make_request.

Another way to solve this is to move all i/o submission to raid5d context.

Thanks to Dean Gaudet for bisecting this down to d89d8796.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <redacted>
---

 block/ll_rw_blk.c      |   16 +++++++++++++---
 drivers/md/raid5.c     |    4 ++--
 include/linux/blkdev.h |    1 +
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
index 8b91994..bff40c2 100644
--- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -3287,16 +3287,26 @@ end_io:
 }
 
 /*
- * We only want one ->make_request_fn to be active at a time,
- * else stack usage with stacked devices could be a problem.
+ * In the general case we only want one ->make_request_fn to be active
+ * at a time, else stack usage with stacked devices could be a problem.
  * So use current->bio_{list,tail} to keep a list of requests
  * submited by a make_request_fn function.
  * current->bio_tail is also used as a flag to say if
  * generic_make_request is currently active in this task or not.
  * If it is NULL, then no make_request is active.  If it is non-NULL,
  * then a make_request is active, and new requests should be added
- * at the tail
+ * at the tail.
+ * However, some stacking drivers, like md-raid5, need to submit
+ * the bio without delay when it may not have the resources to
+ * complete its q->make_request_fn.  generic_make_request_immed is
+ * provided for this explicit purpose.
  */
+void generic_make_request_immed(struct bio *bio)
+{
+	__generic_make_request(bio);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_make_request_immed);
+
 void generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	if (current->bio_tail) {
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c857b5a..ffa2be4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh)
 			    test_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags))
 				atomic_add(STRIPE_SECTORS,
 					&rdev->corrected_errors);
-			generic_make_request(bi);
+			generic_make_request_immed(bi);
 		} else {
 			if (rw == WRITE)
 				set_bit(STRIPE_DEGRADED, &sh->state);
@@ -3124,7 +3124,7 @@ static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct page *tmp_page)
 			if (rw == WRITE &&
 			    test_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags))
 				atomic_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &rdev->corrected_errors);
-			generic_make_request(bi);
+			generic_make_request_immed(bi);
 		} else {
 			if (rw == WRITE)
 				set_bit(STRIPE_DEGRADED, &sh->state);
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index d18ee67..774a3a0 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -642,6 +642,7 @@ extern int blk_register_queue(struct gendisk *disk);
 extern void blk_unregister_queue(struct gendisk *disk);
 extern void register_disk(struct gendisk *dev);
 extern void generic_make_request(struct bio *bio);
+extern void generic_make_request_immed(struct bio *bio);
 extern void blk_put_request(struct request *);
 extern void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *, struct request *);
 extern void blk_end_sync_rq(struct request *rq, int error);

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help