Re: raid10: unfair disk load?
From: Jon Nelson <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-22 13:04:00
On 12/22/07, Janek Kozicki [off-list ref] wrote:
Michael Tokarev said: (by the date of Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:56:09 +0300)quoted
Janek Kozicki wrote:quoted
what's your kernel version? I recall that recently there have been some works regarding load balancing.It was in my original email: The kernel is 2.6.23 Strange I missed the new raid10 development you mentioned (I follow linux-raid quite closely). What change(s) you're referring to?oh sorry it was a patch for raid1, not raid10: http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg17708.html I'm wondering if it could be adapted for raid10 ... Konstantin Sharlaimov said: (by the date of Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:08:42 +1000)quoted
This patch adds RAID1 read balancing to device mapper. A read operation that is close (in terms of sectors) to a previous read or write goes to the same mirror.
Looking at the source for raid10 it already looks like it does some read balancing. For raid10 f2 on a 3 drive raid I've found really impressive performance numbers - as good as raid0. Write speeds are a bit lower but rather better than raid5 on the same devices. -- Jon