Re: Linux RAID Partition Offset 63 cylinders / 30% performance hit?
From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-19 15:31:12
From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-19 15:31:12
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Jon Nelson wrote:
On 12/19/07, Justin Piszcz [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:quoted
quoted
From that setup it seems simple, scrap the partition table and use thedisk device for raid. This is what we do for all data storage disks (hw raid) and sw raid members. /Mattias WadensteinIs there any downside to doing that? I remember when I had to take myThere is one (just pointed out to me yesterday): having the partition and having it labeled as raid makes identification quite a bit easier for humans and software, too. -- Jon
Some nice graphs found here: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2007/02/01/performance-impact-of-disk-misalignment.aspx