Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2007-12-25

Re: Raid over 48 disks

From: Bill Davidsen <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-19 15:26:31

Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
quoted
On Tuesday December 18, normelton@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
We're investigating the possibility of running Linux (RHEL) on top of
Sun's X4500 Thumper box:

http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/

Basically, it's a server with 48 SATA hard drives. No hardware RAID.
It's designed for Sun's ZFS filesystem.

So... we're curious how Linux will handle such a beast. Has anyone run
MD software RAID over so many disks? Then piled LVM/ext3 on top of
that? Any suggestions?
There are those that have run Linux MD RAID on thumpers before. I 
vaguely recall some driver issues (unrelated to MD) that made it less 
suitable than solaris, but that might be fixed in recent kernels.
quoted
Alternately, 8 6drive RAID5s or 6 8raid RAID6s, and use RAID0 to
combine them together.  This would give you adequate reliability and
performance and still a large amount of storage space.
My personal suggestion would be 5 9-disk raid6s, one raid1 root mirror 
and one hot spare. Then raid0, lvm, or separate filesystem on those 5 
raidsets for data, depending on your needs.
Other than thinking raid-10 better than  raid-1for performance, I like it.
You get almost as much data space as with the 6 8-disk raid6s, and 
have a separate pair of disks for all the small updates (logging, 
metadata, etc), so this makes alot of sense if most of the data is 
bulk file access.
-- 
Bill Davidsen [off-list ref]
  "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
  be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark 

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help