Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2007-12-13

Re: optimal IO scheduler choice?

From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-13 11:24:15


On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Hi,

after reading some interesting suggestions on kernel tuning at:

	http://hep.kbfi.ee/index.php/IT/KernelTuning

I am wondering whether 'deadline' is indeed the best IO scheduler (vs.
anticipatory and cfq) for a soft raid5/6 partition on a server?

What is the common wisdom on the subject among linux-raid users and
developers?

Thanks,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I have found anticipatory to be the fastest.

http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/sched/cfq_vs_as_vs_deadline_vs_noop.html

Sequential:
Output of CFQ: (horrid): 311,683 KiB/s
  Output of AS: 443,103 KiB/s

Input CFQ is a little faster.

It depends on your workload I suppose.

Justin.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help