Re: Raid5 assemble after dual sata port failure

Thanks David.

I've had cable/port failures in the past and after re-adding the drive, 
the order changed - I'm not sure why, but I noticed it sometime ago but 
don't remember the exact order.

My initial attempt to assemble, it came up with only two drives in the 
array.  Then I tried assembling with --force and that brought up 3 of 
the drives.  At that point I thought I was good, so I tried mount 
/dev/md0 and it failed.  Would that have written to the disk?  I'm using 
XFS.

After that, I tried assembling with different drive orders on the 
command line, i.e. mdadm -Av --force /dev/md0 /dev/sda1, ... thinking 
that the order might not be right.

At the moment I can't access the machine, but I'll try fsck -n and send 
you the other info later this evening.

Many thanks,
Chris

David Greaves wrote:

Chris Eddington wrote:
  

quoted

Hi,
    

Hi
  

quoted

While on vacation I had one SATA port/cable fail, and then four hours
later a second one fail.  After fixing/moving the SATA ports, I can
reboot and all drives seem to be OK now, but when assembled it won't
recognize the filesystem.
    

That's unusual - if the array comes back then you should be OK.
In general if two devices fail then there is a real data loss risk.
However if the drives are good and there was just a cable glitch, then unless
you're unlucky it's usually fsck fixable.

I see
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 3 drives (out of 4).

which means it's now up and running.

And:
sda1        Events : 0.4880374
sdb1        Events : 0.4880374
sdc1        Events : 0.4857597
sdd1        Events : 0.4880374

so sdc1 is way out of date... we'll add/resync that when everything else is working.

but:
  

quoted

 After futzing around with assemble options
like --force and disk order I couldn't get it to work.
    

Let me check... what commands did you use? Just 'assemble' - which doesn't care
about disk order - or did you try to re-'create' the array - which does care
about disk order and leads us down a different path...
err, scratch that:
  

quoted

 Creation Time : Sun Nov  5 14:25:01 2006
    

OK, it was created a year ago... so you did use assemble.


It is slightly odd to see that the drive order is:
/dev/mapper/sda1
/dev/mapper/sdb1
/dev/mapper/sdd1
/dev/mapper/sdc1
Usually people just create them in order.


Have you done any fsck's that involve a write?

What filesystem are you running? What does your 'fsck -n' (readonly) report?

Also, please report the results of:
 cat /proc/mdadm
 mdadm -D /dev/md0
 cat /etc/mdadm.conf


David