Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2007-10-30
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: Superblocks · Neil Brown <hidden> · 2007-10-30
  • Re: Superblocks · Greg Cormier <hidden> · 2007-10-30

Re: Superblocks

From: Greg Cormier <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-30 16:06:38

Which is the default type of superblock? 0.90 or 1.0?

On 10/30/07, Neil Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Friday October 26, gcormier@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
Can someone help me understand superblocks and MD a little bit?

I've got a raid5 array with 3 disks - sdb1, sdc1, sdd1.

--examine on these 3 drives shows correct information.


However, if I also examine the raw disk devices, sdb and sdd, they
also appear to have superblocks with some semi valid looking
information. sdc has no superblock.
If a partition starts a multiple of 64K from the start of the device,
and ends with about 64K of the end of the device, then a superblock on
the partition will also look like a superblock on the whole device.
This is one of the shortcomings of v0.90 superblocks.  v1.0 doesn't
have this problem.
quoted
How can I clear these? If I unmount my raid, stop md0, it won't clear it.
mdadm --zero-superblock device name

is the best way to remove an unwanted superblock.  Ofcourse in the
above described case, removing the unwanted superblock will remove the
wanted one aswell.

quoted
[root@zeus ~]# mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hdd
mdadm: Couldn't open /dev/hdd for write - not zeroing
As I think someone else pointed out "/dev/hdd" is not "/dev/sdd".

NeilBrown
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help