On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Marko Berg wrote:

Corey Hickey wrote:

quoted

Marko Berg wrote:

quoted

Bill Davidsen wrote:

quoted

Marko Berg wrote:

quoted

Any suggestions on how to fix this, or what to investigate next, would 
be appreciated!

I'm not sure what you're trying to "fix" here, everything you posted 
looks sane.

I'm trying to find the missing 300 GB that, as df reports, are not 
available. I ought to have a 900 GB array, consisting of four 300 GB 
devices, while only 600 GB are available. Adding the fourth device didn't 
increase the capacity of the array (visible, at least). E.g. fdisk reports 
the array size to be 900 G, but df still claims 600 capacity. Any clues 
why?

df reports the size of the filesystem, which is still about 600GB--the 
filesystem doesn't resize automatically when the size of the underlying 
device changes.

You'll need to use resize2fs, resize_reiserfs, or whatever other tool is 
appropriate for your type of filesystem.

-Corey 

Right, so this isn't one of my sharpest days... Thanks a bunch, Corey!

-- 
Marko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Ah, already answered.

Justin.