Re: [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips
From: Matthew Wilcox <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-16 17:48:01
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs
From: Matthew Wilcox <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-16 17:48:01
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:40:00PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
XFS surely rocks, but it's missing one critical component: data=ordered And that's one component that's just too critical to overlook for an enterprise environment that is built on data-integrity over performance. So that's the secret why people still use ext3, and XFS' reliance on external hardware to ensure integrity is really misplaced. Now, maybe when we get the data=ordered onto the VFS level, then maybe XFS may become viable for the enterprise, and ext3 may cease to be KING.
Wow, thanks for bringing an advocacy thread onto linux-fsdevel. Just what we wanted. Do you have any insight into how to "get the data=ordered onto the VFS level"? Because to me, that sounds like pure nonsense. -- "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."