Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 6 authors, 2007-08-30

Re: [md-accel PATCH 03/19] xor: make 'xor_blocks' a library routine for use with async_tx

From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-27 16:13:37
Also in: lkml

[ trimmed the cc ]

On 6/26/07, Satyam Sharma [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Dan,

[ Minor thing ... ]
Not a problem, thanks for taking a look...
On 6/27/07, Dan Williams [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The async_tx api tries to use a dma engine for an operation, but will fall
back to an optimized software routine otherwise.  Xor support is
implemented using the raid5 xor routines.  For organizational purposes this
routine is moved to a common area.
This isn't quite crypto code and isn't connected to or through the cryptoapi
(at least not in this patchset), so I somehow find it misplaced in the crypto/
directory. If all its users are in drivers/md/ then that would be a
better place.
If it is something kernel-global, lib/ sounds more appropriate?
True, it isn't quite crypto code, but I gravitated to this location because:
1/ the models are similar, both are general purpose apis with a driver component
2/ there are already some algorithms in the crypto layer that are not
strictly cryptographic like crc32c, and other checksums
3/ having the code under that directory is a reminder to consider
closer integration when adding support for more complex algorithms
like raid6 p+q (at what point does a 'dma-offload' engine become a
'crypto' engine?  at some point they converge)

The hope is that other subsystems beyond md could benefit from offload
engines.  For example, the crc32c calculations in btrfs might be a
good candidate, and kcopyd integration has crossed my mind.
Satyam
Dan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help