Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 4 authors, 2007-05-29

Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem

From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-24 11:20:35
Also in: linux-xfs

Including XFS mailing list on this one.

On Thu, 24 May 2007, Pallai Roland wrote:
Hi,

I wondering why the md raid5 does accept writes after 2 disks failed. I've an
array built from 7 drives, filesystem is XFS. Yesterday, an IDE cable failed
(my friend kicked it off from the box on the floor:) and 2 disks have been
kicked but my download (yafc) not stopped, it tried and could write the file
system for whole night!
Now I changed the cable, tried to reassembly the array (mdadm -f --run),
event counter increased from 4908158 up to 4929612 on the failed disks, but I
cannot mount the file system and the 'xfs_repair -n' shows lot of errors
there. This is expainable by the partially successed writes. Ext3 and JFS
has "error=" mount option to switch filesystem read-only on any error, but
XFS hasn't: why? It's a good question too, but I think the md layer could
save dumb filesystems like XFS if denies writes after 2 disks are failed, and
I cannot see a good reason why it's not behave this way.

Do you have better idea how can I avoid such filesystem corruptions in the
future? No, I don't want to use ext3 on this box. :)


my mount error:
XFS: Log inconsistent (didn't find previous header)
XFS: failed to find log head
XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 5
XFS: log mount failed


--
d

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help